Hi,
On 05/21/2018 10:14 AM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:07 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
<glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
On 05/18/2018 07:09 PM, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
The amount of work you have to put into this far outbalances the
amount of work the OpenJDK maintainers would have to spend when (if
ever) they were to merge down upstream libjpeg.
You might have more luck if you replaced libjpeg with libjpeg-turbo
which is used as the default libjpeg implementation in most Linux
distributions these days.
Good idea, but not my call to make....
We ship libjpeg-turbo with RH windows builds of OpenJDK. I can say that
it is not the nicest codebase to build (mostly asm, written for NASM;
can be built without asm part, but that is not how most people use it).
While linux distros give it for free, it may be not an optimal variant
for a portable jpeg impl.
Just my 0.02 .
..Thomas
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
--
-Alex
