On 05/24/2018 02:59 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 05/24/2018 02:57 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: >> Oh. I am just confused you are replying to the stale review thread for >> "Minimal, Zero builds fail >> after JDK-8202377 (Modularize C2 barriers)". What you are seeing is >> something else. > > As I said, "hg blame" indicates the change which probably broke linux-sparc > here is 8202377, most likely because it was assumed SPARC needs to work > on Solaris only -.-.
Yes, 8202377 might have caused more than one type of regression! This is something else. Submit the new bug for it. Let's not do this discussion in the thread for *another* bug that was already fixed. This would bite us once you would start doing mailing list archeology months later. -Aleksey
