> On 22 Jun 2018, at 23:29, Doug Simon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 22 Jun 2018, at 23:16, Ekaterina Pavlova <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Erik, Doug, >> >> thank you a lot for your reviews and advises. >> I fixed everything what Erik has pointed out, please see my answers inlined. >> As about moving more staff in 'updategraalinopenjdk' can we consider this as >> next step? >> I am not quite familiar with 'updategraalinopenjdk' and didn't contribute >> into Graal ws yet, >> so I will prefer to do this improvement/refactoring as part of separate JDK >> issue. > > Sorry for not being clearer. I don't expect you to fix/enhance > updategraalinopenjdk. I was simply commenting on a possible solution to > Joel's reasonable request for having Graal sources and test layout more > normalized in the JDK code base. Of course I meant Erik's request ;-) -Doug
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal unit tests under jtreg Erik Joelsson
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal unit tests under j... Doug Simon
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal unit tests under j... Ekaterina Pavlova
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal unit tests und... Doug Simon
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal unit tests... Doug Simon
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal unit tests... Ekaterina Pavlova
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal unit tests und... Erik Joelsson
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal unit tests... Ekaterina Pavlova
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal unit t... Erik Joelsson
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal u... Ekaterina Pavlova
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal unit t... Magnus Ihse Bursie
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Graal u... Ekaterina Pavlova
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port Gra... Ekaterina Pavlova
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port... Erik Joelsson
- Re: RFR(M): 8205207: Port... Ekaterina Pavlova
