OHH ... thanks for the lesson. I'm disappointed by Apple's apparently deliberate version obfuscation.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33603027/get-apple-clang-version-and-corresponding-upstream-llvm-version On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:51 AM, Erik Joelsson <erik.joels...@oracle.com> wrote: > That's what the compiler says: > > $ clang --version > Apple LLVM version 9.1.0 (clang-902.0.39.2) > Target: x86_64-apple-darwin17.6.0 > Thread model: posix > InstalledDir: /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/ > XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin > > I don't know how that version relates to the official clang/llvm version, > it's most likely apple specific. But since that is how the compiler > identifies itself, I'm going to go with it. > > /Erik > > On 2018-07-23 10:20, Martin Buchholz wrote: > > + macOS Apple Xcode 9.4 (using clang 9.1.0) > > Is there really such a thing as clang 9.1.0, given that 6.0.1 is the > latest from http://releases.llvm.org/ ? > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Erik Joelsson <erik.joels...@oracle.com> > wrote: > >> The build documentation needs to be updated to reflect the compiler >> updates that took place at Oracle for JDK 11. >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208096 >> >> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8208096/webrev.01/ >> >> /Erik >> >> > >
