On 18/09/2018 14:17, Bob Vandette wrote:
I only did some basic testing of the hard-float abi. Bell SW has offered to do
more extensive testing
as part of this JEP.
I have no way of knowing if any of the other profiles are being used but I
would think it’s
worth keeping them in the event that someone wants to try to build/test these
other configurations.
I am using the abi profiles arm-vfp-hflt and arm-sflt. So far I have only built jdk9u with these profiles. It would be a
serious problem for me if these profiles don't continue to work on later JDK versions.
Simon
The goal of this JEP is to eliminate the arm64 port and not cause any other
changes in behavior.
Bob.
On Sep 17, 2018, at 10:53 PM, David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com> wrote:
Hi Bob,
On 18/09/2018 2:20 AM, Bob Vandette wrote:
Please review the changes related to JEP 340 which remove the second 64-bit ARM
port
from the JDK.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bobv/8209093/webrev.01
I’ve testing building the remaining 32 and 64 bit ARM ports including the
minimal, client and server VMs.
I’ve run specJVM98 on the three 32-bit ARM VMs.
Did you test all the ARM related abi-profiles? It seems to me they were only
for Oracle's ARM32 port and may have never been used otherwise. I would have
expected all that stuff to be removed.
Cheers,
David
I also verified that Linux x64 builds.
Bob.
