On 09/27/2018 10:21 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 09/27/2018 08:22 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Otherwise looks good and trivial.
> 
> No, it is neither good nor trivial:some of those should be 
> ShouldNotReachHere().
> I'll post a webrev later.

Okay, let's see it.

I was mostly concerned with having the same control flow as before, did I miss 
some change that is
actually non-trivial? On the second read, this change in 
c1_LIRAssembler_aarch64.cpp looks
suspicious, as it elevates ShouldNotReachHere to default case, rather than 
letting default thing
fall-through?

         break;
+      default:
         ShouldNotReachHere();
       }


-Aleksey


Reply via email to