Yes! Thank you for your sponsor Erik!

Jing Tian

在 2019/4/17 21:16, Erik Joelsson 写道:
Looks good!

Do you need a sponsor?

/Erik

On 2019-04-16 18:29, Jing Tian wrote:
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lzhai/8222444/webrev.03/

在 2019/4/17 9:26, Jing Tian 写道:
Sorry, because of my carelessness, I have caused so much trouble.
This is the updated version.
Please review! Thank you.

Jing Tian

在 2019/4/17 0:47, Erik Joelsson 写道:
Hello,

Please add a space after the $ in the examples to match the other example lines in the file. Otherwise I'm OK with this version.

/Erik

On 2019-04-16 09:10, Jing Tian wrote:
Hi Erik ,

Thank you so much for your suggestions!
Here is the updated version http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lzhai/8222444/webrev.02/.
Please review.

Jing Tian


在 2019/4/16 21:20, Erik Joelsson 写道:
Hello Jing Tian,

The last sentence doesn't really fit with the rest. I would just remove it and then list examples for both situations like this:

    $ LANG=en_US make test TEST=...
    $ make test JTREG="VM_OPTIONS=-Duser.language=en -Duser.country=US" TEST=...

While exporting LANG is certainly a valid solution, I think it's better if the examples are actual make command lines. I would expect most users to be familiar enough with the shell to know that variables can also be exported.

/Erik

On 2019-04-16 01:10, Jing Tian wrote:
Thank you for your suggestions. I have reworked the documentation and I think this is a prudent approach so far. Regarding the other seven test cases, I will continue to find out why they can't pass the test.

JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8222444
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lzhai/8222444/webrev.01/

Jing Tian

在 2019/4/15 23:24, [email protected] 写道:
As for the wording, I'd suggest "Non-US Locale" instead of "Non-English." Some tests may depend on US customary behavior, such as date format, decimal separator, etc.

Naoto

On 4/15/19 6:59 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,

Documenting this is certainly the least we can do. If our tests depend on the locale being set to en_US, then I think the best action would be to provide such a configuration directly in RunTests.gmk. Exporting LANG should work for all Unix OSes, but most likely not on Windows. The extra VM_OPTIONS would fix most of them it seems. Would it be worth investigating the remaining 7 and get them fixed?

In the meantime, documenting seems prudent. I would suggest something like this:

### Non-English Locale

If your locale is non-English, some tests are likely to fail. To work around this you can set the locale to English. On Unix platforms simply setting `LANG=en_US` in the environment before running tests should work. On Windows, setting `JTREG="VM_OPTIONS=-Duser.language=en -Duser.country=US"` helps for most, but not all test cases.

/Erik

On 2019-04-14 20:28, Jing Tian wrote:
Hi,

We have discussed the issue of the test cases fail because of locale before[1].

Thanks for the suggestions given by Naoto and David. I think we can put this advice in the test doc, which may be better for people to test. This advice can avoid the problem that caused by locale and we can pay more attention to the functional points that the test itself focuses on.

Set JTREG="VM_OPTIONS=-Duser.language=en -Duser.country=US" , it does pass most test cases, but there are still very few test cases(7 in total) can't pass the test when they are in a non-English locale.

I think if 'make test' in a non-English locale, we can set the locale to English first. Use 'export LANG="en_US"'. But this method is just for Linux. I test "tier1 tier2 tier3" after setting LANG="en_US". The problems caused by the local settings have not appeared anymore.


JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8222444
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lzhai/8222444/webrev.00/

The testing.html is updated automatically using "make update-build-docs" with pandoc version 2.7.2.

[1] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/2019-March/013144.html <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/2019-March/013144.html>

Cheers,
Jing Tian











Reply via email to