Hi Paul,
Thanks for the review!
On Mon, 2019-07-15 at 18:02 +0000, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
> In CompileJvm.gmk, I'd replace
>
> - ASFLAGS := $(JVM_ASFLAGS), \
> + ASFLAGS := $(JVM_ASFLAGS) $(EXTRA_ASFLAGS), \
>
> with adding EXTRA_ASFLAGS to JVM_ASFLAGS right after where JVM_LDFLAGS is
> finalized, vis
>
> JVM_LDFLAGS += \
> $(SHARED_LIBRARY_FLAGS) \
> $(JVM_LDFLAGS_FEATURES) \
> $(EXTRA_LDFLAGS) \
> #
> +
> + JVM_ASFLAGS += ${EXTRA_ASFLAGS)
>
> That way, uses of EXTRA_xxFLAGS are all in one place and possible future
> file-specific assembler flags don't have to duplicate adding EXTRA_ASFLAGS.
Fixed as suggested:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8227397/02/webrev/
Thanks,
Severin
> Otherwise, good.
>
> Paul
>
> On 7/15/19, 7:27 AM, "build-dev on behalf of Severin Gehwolf"
> <build-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net on behalf of sgehw...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Anyone?
>
> On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 17:56 +0200, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could I please get a review for this patch which adds a new configure
> > option --with-extra-asflags? The issue at hand is that we, Red Hat,
> > need to pass certain extra flags to the assembler when OpenJDK is being
> > compiled. -Wa,--generate-missing-build-notes=yes in our case. That's
> > currently not possible and extra C/C++ flags would need to be used,
> > which seems not nice.
> >
> > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227397
> > webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8227397/01/webrev/
> >
> > After this patch extra assembler flags get added to *.s/.S files for
> > libjvm.so:
> >
> > $ grep -n generate-missing-build-notes=yes
> build/linux-x86_64-server-release/build.log
> > 1049: [18] ASFLAGS := -m64 -Wa,--generate-missing-build-notes=yes
> > 15005:( /usr/bin/rm -f
> /disk/openjdk/upstream-sources/openjdk-head/build/linux-x86_64-server-release/hotspot/variant-server/libjvm/objs/linux_x86_64.o.log
> && /usr/bin/gcc -c -m64 -Wa,--generate-missing-build-notes=yes -g -o
> /disk/openjdk/upstream-sources/openjdk-head/build/linux-x86_64-server-release/hotspot/variant-server/libjvm/objs/linux_x86_64.o
>
> /disk/openjdk/upstream-sources/openjdk-head/src/hotspot/os_cpu/linux_x86/linux_x86_64.s
> > >(/usr/bin/tee -a
> /disk/openjdk/upstream-sources/openjdk-head/build/linux-x86_64-server-release/hotspot/variant-server/libjvm/objs/linux_x86_64.o.log)
> 2> >(/usr/bin/tee -a
> /disk/openjdk/upstream-sources/openjdk-head/build/linux-x86_64-server-release/hotspot/variant-server/libjvm/objs/linux_x86_64.o.log
> >&2) || ( exitcode=$? && /usr/bin/cp
> /disk/openjdk/upstream-sources/openjdk-head/build/linux-x86_64-server-release/hotspot/variant-server/libjvm/objs/linux_x86_64.o.log
>
> /disk/openjdk/upstream-sources/openjdk-head/build/linux-x86_64-server-release/make-support/failure-logs/hotspot_variant-server_libjvm_objs_linux_x86_64.o.log
> && /usr/bin/cp
> /disk/openjdk/upstream-sources/openjdk-head/build/linux-x86_64-server-release/hotspot/variant-server/libjvm/objs/linux_x86_64.o.cmdline
>
> /disk/openjdk/upstream-sources/openjdk-head/build/linux-x86_64-server-release/make-support/failure-logs/hotspot_variant-server_libjvm_objs_linux_x86_64.o.cmdline
> && exit $exitcode ) )
> >
> > I'll run this through jdk/submit before I push.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Severin
>
>
>
