Hi Mandy,

On 11/21/19 5:45 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
CSR needs to mention that jar -n option is removed.  I made minor edit to the CSR to state that jdk.pack module is removed.

thanks for the changes, I added a mention to the jar -n option,


Mandy

Thanks,
Vicente


On 11/21/19 2:22 PM, Vicente Romero wrote:
please wait, I found some additional dependencies on module jdk.pack, will submit another webrev, sorry

Vicente

On 11/21/19 2:53 PM, Vicente Romero wrote:
Hi,

I think I have covered all the proposed fixes so far. This is the last iteration of the webrev [1], all the current changes are in this one, the code hasn't been split into different webrevs. I'm also forwarding to build-dev as there are some build related changes too. The CSR for this change is at [2]

Thanks for all the comment so far,
Vicente

[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vromero/8234542/webrev.02/
[2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8234596



On 11/20/19 8:21 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Correction ...

On 21/11/2019 9:10 am, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Vicente,

Not sure the best mailing list for this review ... jdk-dev may not be well monitored.

Is there a separate review thread for the actual tool removal (jdk.pack)

I overlooked the removal of jdk.pack (scrolling too fast through the webrev) - apologies.

David
-----

and build system changes?

This removal seems okay, but I found one additional reference:

./src/utils/IdealGraphVisualizer/nbproject/project.properties:auxiliary.org-netbeans-modules-apisupport-installer.pack200-enabled=false

Thanks,
David
-----

On 21/11/2019 8:54 am, Vicente Romero wrote:
Hi,

I need a reviewer for the changes to remove pack200 and unpack200 from the JDK. The webrev with the removal is at [1]. This patch is the "implementation" of JEP 367 [2]. The patch is basically removing the Pack200 related APIs plus its implementation plus any reference to it in other tools like `jar`. In the case of `jar`, Pack200 was only used if the `-n` flag was passed to the tool. I have removed the code that was executed when that flag was passed. I have also removed all the tests for Pack200.

Thanks,
Vicente

[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vromero/8234542/webrev.00/
[2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8232022




Reply via email to