Hi, +1 I think this is a candidate for the label "openjdk-na" then.
Best regards, Goetz. > -----Original Message----- > From: jdk-updates-dev <jdk-updates-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net> On > Behalf Of Langer, Christoph > Sent: Montag, 9. März 2020 17:29 > To: Erik Joelsson <erik.joels...@oracle.com>; jdk-updates- > d...@openjdk.java.net > Cc: build-dev <build-dev@openjdk.java.net> > Subject: [CAUTION] RE: 11u RFR: 8232569: Use test image from different jib > profile for testing > > Thanks Erik, for this clarification. > > We won't backport it then. > > Cheers > Christoph > > -----Original Message----- > From: Erik Joelsson <erik.joels...@oracle.com> > Sent: Montag, 9. März 2020 16:44 > To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.lan...@sap.com>; jdk-updates- > d...@openjdk.java.net > Cc: build-dev <build-dev@openjdk.java.net> > Subject: Re: 11u RFR: 8232569: Use test image from different jib profile for > testing > > > On 2020-03-09 08:14, Langer, Christoph wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Please help reviewing this Oracle parity backport > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8232569 > > Original Change: https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/559c46cd0e8b > > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8232569.11u/ > > > > I had to make several adaptions because some predecessors were missing > regarding jcov. Will run the change through our nightly tests but I doubt the > file > is used there. > > > > Is this file only used in internal Oracle builds or does it have use cases > outside? (I guess this question unmasks my ignorance in that area 😉) > > This file is only used by Oracle. It's used to interact with our > dependency management and build configuration system ("jib"), which is > internal. We keep it in the source code since this configuration is very > highly version specific and frequently changes in lock step with other > source code changes. While the exact meaning of the contents of the file > isn't obvious to an external reader, certain things pertaining to how > Oracle configures builds can still be gleaned from it and may be useful > to some (current compiler versions, values of some configure options etc). > > I would very much recommend against trying to merge changes here for > OpenJDK update releases. > > /Erik > > > Thanks > > Christoph > >
