Hi Volker,

> > Out of interest, is the AssertEquals macro something worth backporting
> > at some point? Generally, I find its worthwhile if people are going to
> > be doing the same replacement in multiple backports.
> >
> 
> I actually wanted to answer something like "..lets wait until we get
> another backport requiring this.." but already before answering we
> already ran into such a case (see my answer to the other thread
> "8232748: "Build static versions of certain JDK libraries"). The only
> problem is that "8189861: Refactor CacheFind" which introduced
> AssertEquals is not a trivial downport.
> 
> Please let me know what you think?

I've just proposed the backport of "8189861: Refactor CacheFind". Can you 
rebase your change on that and see if it works?

Best regards
Christoph

Reply via email to