On 5/11/20, 10:52 AM, "Magnus Ihse Bursie" <magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com> 
wrote:

    CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not 
click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the 
content is safe.



    On 2020-05-11 18:44, Liu, Xin wrote:
    > Hi, Martin and Magnus,
    >
    > Thank you to fix this problem. sorry, I didn't realize that awk program 
is less portable.
    > Your script looks good to me.
    >
    > Why it works by reordering \._\- in []. Is it the only potential issue?
    It's an old trick. If you have a range, e.g. a-z, then "-" is
    interpreted as the range separator.  So if you wanted to include a
    literal "-" in a []  regex set, you had to put it first or last, since
    then it could not be part of a range. The ability to escape - using \ is
    much newer, and apparently not supported on AIX.

    /Magnus

Thank you to let me know that!

Thanks,
--lx

    >
    > For your information, the reason I added '-' because I found the suffix 
'-internal' when you build from openjdk source directly.
    > "openjdk version "15-internal" 2020-09-15"
    >
    > thanks,
    > --lx
    >
    >
    > On 5/11/20, 9:26 AM, "build-dev on behalf of Magnus Ihse Bursie" 
<build-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net on behalf of magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com> 
wrote:
    >
    >      CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do 
not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know 
the content is safe.
    >
    >
    >
    >      On 2020-05-11 18:17, Doerr, Martin wrote:
    >      >
    >      > Hi Magnus,
    >      >
    >      > thank you for proposing a fix which allows building with old awk on
    >      > AIX. Works fine.
    >      >
    >      > Here’s the webrev:
    >      >
    >      > 
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mdoerr/8244756_AIX_fix_awk_expr/webrev.00/
    >      >
    >      > Would you like to be mentioned as author?
    >      >
    >      Whatever. :) If you want.
    >
    >      /Magnus
    >      >
    >      > Best regards,
    >      >
    >      > Martin
    >      >
    >
    >


Reply via email to