On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:43:10 GMT, Chris Plummer <cjplum...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Monica Beckwith has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev
>> excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull 
>> request contains 17 additional commits since
>> the last revision:
>>  - cleanup for 8253539: Remove unused JavaThread functions for 
>> set_last_Java_fp/pc
>>  - cleanup for 8253457: Remove unimplemented register stack functions
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into jdk-windows
>>  - Update orderAccess_windows_aarch64.hpp
>>    
>>    changing from Acq-reL to Sequential Consistency to avoid compiler 
>> reordering when no ordering hints are provided
>>  - 8248787: G1: Workaround MSVC bug
>>    Reviewed-by:
>>    Contributed-by: mbeckwit, luhenry, burban
>>  - 8248670: Windows: Exception handling support on AArch64
>>    Reviewed-by:
>>    Contributed-by: mbeckwit, luhenry, burban
>>  - 8248660: AArch64: Make _clear_cache and _nop portable
>>    Summary: __builtin___clear_cache, etc.
>>    Contributed-by: mbeckwit, luhenry, burban
>>  - 8248659: AArch64: Extend CPU Feature detection
>>    Reviewed-by:
>>    Contributed-by: mbeckwit, luhenry, burban
>>  - 8248656: Add Windows AArch64 platform support code
>>    Reviewed-by:
>>    Contributed-by: mbeckwit, luhenry, burban
>>  - 8248498: Add build system support for Windows AArch64
>>    Reviewed-by:
>>    Contributed-by: mbeckwit, luhenry, burban
>>  - ... and 7 more: 
>> https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/451890eb...2b662010
>
> I looked at changes to existing SA files. These changes look fine.
> 
> I did not look at the new aarch64 SA files other than the copyright section. 
> I assume they are clones of the x64
> versions with some symbolic renaming. If there is any more than that and 
> you'd like me to have a look, let me know.
> As for the copyright in the new SA files, I believe it is incorrect and needs 
> to include Oracle. There are a number of
> other non-SA files that are new and also have the same copyright issue.
> I also looked at 
> src/jdk.attach/windows/classes/sun/tools/attach/AttachProviderImpl.java. It 
> looks fine except it needs
> a copyright date update.

@plummercj thank you for your feedback. I've updated the copyright in mentioned 
files.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/212

Reply via email to