On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:53:53 GMT, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I realized that JDK-8254282 missed "Linux x32" for the platform selection. >> While you can guess it is accepted from reading the workflow, it would be >> more convenient to have it in the default argument list. > > Note that "Linux x32" is ambigious as this is the name for the x32 ABI > (x86_64 with 32-bit pointers). I agree with @glaubitz; "x32" is an odd choice of name for what we've been calling "x86" in the JDK build all the time. I realize this unfortunate naming arrived with JDK-8254282, which I unfortunately was too late to review. However, I'd very much want to request the "x32" naming changed to "x86" consistently in submit.yml. This relates to JDK-8255305 as well. And frankly, I don't understand why this is a separate bug, instead of a part of JDK-8255305. Can you please explain the rationale for that? If you just want to make additional changes to JDK-8255305, there is really no need to open a new JBS issue and PR -- just push additional commits to JDK-8255305! ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/869
