On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 18:28:04 GMT, Erik Joelsson <er...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Before this fix, the alignment is defaulting to that of the build host. We > would like to provide a way to produce a JDK distribution, with a pre > generated CDS archive, where the alignment has the highest known value of any > target host for maximum compatibility. The currently known such values are > 64K for Linux and 16K for Mac. If we aren't going to allow the user (builder > of OpenJDK) the free choice of any alignment anyway, would it make sense to > limit the choice between something more abstract like "host" and "compatible" > instead of listing explicit numbers? That's problematic because it assumes we know all of the possible alignments. At the present time we think that 64 is the largest we'll ever encounter, but IMO that isn't a great way to think about things. It would be very nice indeed if we didn't have to edit OpenJDK for the next page size. I guess 4k, 16k, and 64k are all we'll ever see, but I wouldn't bet the farm on it. > Finally there is the question of if "host" or "compatible" should be the > default. I see good arguments for both sides, as long as there is an option > to switch between the too that isn't too cryptic to understand. I would have thought that "host" made the most sense, but I don't really mind. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2651
