On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 02:38:55 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Hi Jie,
>
> I don't think this is the right solution here. The logic for when to use a
> NOCOOPS archive seems inconsistent between the generate and use phases. If
> 32-bit is logically always a no-coops archive it should still be called
> classes.jsa. The logic to look for the archive seems wrong to me.
>
> David
Thanks @dholmes-ora for your review.
The logic to look for the archive has been fixed.
Testing:
- runtime/cds on Linux/{x64, x86}, no regression
Thanks.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3109
