On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 17:40:50 GMT, Dan Heidinga <github.com+8503711+danheidi...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > (2) looks appealing for me, for a different reason: if you regenerate `.md` > > -> `.html`, and choose the unexpected pandoc version (for example one > > provided by distro), then `.html` diff would have a lot of fluff not > > related to the actual change. And that would keep happening as people > > regenerate `.html` with their own versions of pandocs :) Removing `.html` > > from repo resolves this problem at its core. > > It still leaves the original question though - should the `.md` file link to > the `.html` or the `.md` version? My preference is the `.md` file as markdown > is more readable, IMO, for both offline and github viewing. Yes, it does leave the original question unanswered, apologies. I would suggest to change all `.html` -> `.md` links in the PR that removes `.html` completely. It would be a larger PR and would probably require some buy-ins, but I think those are relatively simple. Removing HTMLs would not introduce any ambiguity with these link rewrites. At the same time, I have no problems with this tiny PR as well. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5417
