On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 09:56:41 GMT, Andrew Haley <a...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> You can support one without the other. >> The architecture allows you to have one without the other. >> The GCC flag is an enum of "none|standard|pac-ret[+leaf]|bti", with some of >> them changing depending on which cpu you specify to -mcpu (8.0,8.3,8.5 etc). >> Clang has the same flags. Interestingly, on MacOS Clang, -mbranch-protection >> is available but it'll give incorrect code. Instead you build with -arch >> arm64e. >> >> If your system had both, the only scenario I could see for only wanting just >> one would be for test/dev purposes. In a real production scenario you would >> want everything the system supports or nothing. >> >> An earlier version of my code had a >> UseBranchProtection="pac|bti|pac+bti|all|none" style option > >> You can support one without the other. The architecture allows you to have >> one without the other. The GCC flag is an enum of >> "none|standard|pac-ret[+leaf]|bti", with some of them changing depending on >> which cpu you specify to -mcpu (8.0,8.3,8.5 etc). Clang has the same flags. > > OK, so we have a precedent. > >> If your system had both, the only scenario I could see for only wanting just >> one would be for test/dev purposes. In a real production scenario you would >> want everything the system supports or nothing. > > Yes. > >> An earlier version of my code had a >> UseBranchProtection="pac|bti|pac+bti|all|none" style option > > That sounds great. > > It seems to me that following the GCC/Clang precedent is the wisest thing we > could do. I can see no possible advantage in diverging: it only confuses > programmers. That gives us: A new flag -XX:UseBranchProtection With the options: none - no PAC support. (Default) standard - PAC support if the system supports it and the java binary was compiled with PAC. Otherwise off. pac-ret - PAC support, regardless if the system supports it or the java binary was compiled with PAC. A later BTI patch would add: standard - also adds BTI if the system supports it and the java binary was compiled with BTI. bti - BTI support, regardless if the system supports it or the java binary was compiled with BTI. Also, concat the flags with "+". Eg: standard+bti. No need to do this until BTI is added. For MacOS, you can only use PAC functionality when compiled for arm64e. Therefore arm64e would be supported by compiling the java binary for the arm64e and would always be enabled in that scenario. UseBranchProtection on MacoOS will only support the none option. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6334
