On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 23:56:19 GMT, Tyler Steele <d...@openjdk.java.net> wrote:
> > Be warned: This may take time. You certainly want your change to get > > integrated at some point of time. > > I think this has turned out to be sage advice from Martin, as I believe > neither of us has received a reply from the Oracle copyright advisor. In the > interests of completing this change, I would be happy to move forward with > either of the following. > > 1. The suggestion from IBM legal department to add both Oracle, and IBM > copyright lines (with IBM lines only added to files with significant > modification, as discussed above). > 2. Reverting copyright header modifications other than year updates. > > What are you most comfortable with, my sterling team of reviewers? Hi Tyler, I'm fine with either. Cheers, Thomas ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6885
