Ah.
-phil
On 5/23/22 8:18 AM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi,
that's because the PR is a based on a pre-loom version of master.
Best regards
Christoph
-----Original Message-----
From: build-dev <build-dev-r...@openjdk.java.net> On Behalf Of Philip Race
Sent: Montag, 23. Mai 2022 17:14
To: Aleksey Shipilev <sh...@redhat.com>; Ioi Lam <ioi....@oracle.com>;
build-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: pre-submit tests for github PRs
BTW I am wondering whether I should believe this explanation since it does
pass sometimes,
eg :
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/8820
How is that possible ?
-phil
On 5/23/22 8:05 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
On 5/23/22 16:53, Ioi Lam wrote:
On 5/23/2022 4:41 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 22/05/2022 23:58, David Holmes wrote:
GHA tests a range of OpenJDK ports, not just the "mainstream
platforms".
The existing linux-86 failures (and others) are due to the Loom
integration which only fully supports a couple of platforms and
which broke all the other ports upon initial integration. Some
folks in the community have been working through things to fix that.
GHA is configured to cross build for most of these
ports/configurations and they should pass. Running them is another
matter of course. GHA does run some tests on linux-x86 and the
x86_32 port does need work before it can run the tests with --enable-
preview.
Aleksey Shipilëv seems to be making good progress on it.
-Alan
Maybe it makes sense to disable the x86 GHA runs before the
underlying issue is fixed? There's too much noise.
There is a slightly better way to do it:
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/8843
