On Tue, 9 May 2023 00:50:56 GMT, Fei Yang <fy...@openjdk.org> wrote: >> That's unfortunate. Could you try this patch, which probes the address range >> to see if it can reserve the memory somewhere else within >> `[ZAddressHeapBase, ZAddressHeapBase+ZAddressOffsetMax)`: >> https://github.com/stefank/jdk/tree/zgc_generational_review_test_zforwarding > >> That's unfortunate. Could you try this patch, which probes the address range >> to see if it can reserve the memory somewhere else within >> `[ZAddressHeapBase, ZAddressHeapBase+ZAddressOffsetMax)`: >> https://github.com/stefank/jdk/tree/zgc_generational_review_test_zforwarding > > @stefank : Good news is that this gtest case can now pass on linux-riscv64 > with this patch. I tried several times and it seems we could always reserve a > space of ZGranuleSize(0x200000) bytes at address 0x852000000. Thanks for > fixing this!
Thanks for helping out with this. I've now pushed the proposed patch. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13771#discussion_r1188168418
