Hi, Yes, patches from debian/patches. They can be applied with quilt[1] and only patches listed in series are needed.
Best Regards, Vladimir. [1] https://linux.die.net/man/1/quilt On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 1:19 AM Mykhaylo Lodygin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Vladimir, thank you for your attention, > did you mean set of patches located in debian/patches ? those are patched > (all in the series file) or some other? > Mykhaylo > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 11:11 PM Vladimir Petko > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I believe this was due to building OpenJDK from Debian original >> tarball that does not contain bundled libraries. Building from it >> requires applying Debian patches via `quilt push -a` and using >> configure arguments from `debian/rules`. >> >> Best Regards, >> Vladimir. >> >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 1:02 AM David Holmes <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > On 28/08/2023 9:54 pm, Mykhaylo Lodygin wrote: >> > > Hello colleagues, >> > > I've build JDK locally successfully, but got several tests "FAILED". >> > >> > What did you build? images? what about test-images? >> > >> > > Tried to run one of the failing test separately with "make test >> > > TEST="<path_to_test>". >> > > Were unable to do so due to build error - the compiler was unfamiliar to >> > > include path to winscard.h, fixed with configuration option: >> > > bash configure --with-extra-cflags="-I/usr/include/PCSC" >> > >> > What test(s), on what platform? >> > >> > > next error was incapability of linker to link with libjpeg - fixed with >> > > adding --with-libjpeg=system to configure. >> > > the issue was solved, but a new one was added with missing libgif. >> > > I was curious and tried a test that "Passed", thinking that "failure" >> > > could had happen due to inability to build the test. Tried >> > > sun/util/calendar/zi/Beyond2037.java but got a very similar error of >> > > inability to link with liblcms2-2. >> > > I'm flabbergasted, hence my questions are: does "make test" target is >> > > expected to rebuild JDK's code? does my approach of adding options to >> > > configure script is proper one? How come a test could be "Passed" while >> > > running it separately results in inability to build the test? >> > >> > As Erik indicated we need more information/details. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > David >> > >> > >> > > Thank you. >> > > Mykhaylo Lodygin
