On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:03:37 GMT, Bernhard Urban-Forster <bur...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Instead of discussing removal of windows/aarch64 (although the general rule >> in OpenJDK is that ports that are not maintained by anyone should be >> removed); let's stick to the question here: do we need to export `das1()` >> for debugging? > > Personally I have never used `das`/`das1` on any AArch64 port when debugging. > I guess it was somewhat handy when the backend was originally developed. I > would argue that the built-in disassembler of any debugger and `disnm` from > `debug.cpp` are good enough, and thus `das`/`das1` can be removed. What do > you think @theRealAph ? Hi all - yes the Windows Arm port is maintained by Microsoft's JDK team. How can we help in this particular case? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17967#discussion_r1501690000
