On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 01:12:49 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Also to point it out if it's not clear already, `libjvm.so` is 
>> implementation detail. One cannot safely that exists at runtime. The static 
>> JDK case is a good example.
>
>> Also to point it out if it's not clear already, libjvm.so is implementation 
>> detail. One cannot safely that exists at runtime. The static JDK case is a 
>> good example.
> 
> Is there any other example? Presuming the existence of dynamic linked 
> libraries is pretty standard.

Thanks, @dholmes-ora!

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23431#issuecomment-2648837104

Reply via email to