On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 19:55:18 GMT, Mark Reinhold <m...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Minimally, I would not refer to the narrative specs which are part of the >> platform as "Related documents" since that makes them sound weakly >> advisory/informational. Perhaps something like "[Additional >> specifications][../specs/index.html] for the Java language...". >> >> Also, if you're going to provide a link to the narrative specs, I'd also >> consider adding a reference to the external spec page >> (https://download.java.net/java/early_access/jdk25/docs/api/external-specs.html). > > The first word after “related documents” is “specify,” which doesn’t sound > advisory to me. > > I don’t think the external spec page is of sufficiently broad interest to > highlight it here. > > (To imply that our tool man pages are “specifications” is a bit much, but > making that distinction isn’t worth the trouble here.) TIL about that external spec page. Thanks! ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26547#discussion_r2246108261
