On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 05:47:06 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> By rough count there are 1300 tests that have an explicit timeout set. This > change would reduce the actual applied timeout to a quarter of what was > previously used, yet you have only had to bump the timeout value for a > fraction of the tests - which I find somewhat (pleasantly) surprising. It may > be that many of these timeouts stem from a time when we had much much slower > machines, so a refresh might not be a bad thing. It will take some time to > see the full effects of this change though. Thanks David! And as you said, a few more adjustments will probably be needed when we have run this for a while. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26749#issuecomment-3199869795
