On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 12:00:01 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore <[email protected]> wrote:
>> That said, in Rich formatter we also need to preprocess, so perhaps keeping >> the code as is here would be more symmetric... > > I suppose overall I'm not entirely sure if, at this point, pattern > descriptions should be pattern descriptions, or already translated into some > kind of fragment -- because the code in formatters can deal with fragments > recursively very well -- but can do less so with objects. I tried to convert to fragments, feels better now - thanks! ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27256#discussion_r2732834629
