On Fri, 29 May 2026 14:05:18 GMT, Erik Joelsson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> This PR seems to be overwrapped with #31227. How should I treat #31227? I >> can close it if this PR can cover the problem in it. >> >> I've created PR #31227 for fixing the problem on x64. I saw the error which >> related to multilib when I built devkit on Rocky Linux and Fedora, but this >> PR does not seem to fix it (`--disable-multilib` is not specified specified >> for GCC). >> >> In #31227, @erikj79 commented he will discuss about it internally, thus I >> guess the direction of fixing should follow that conclusion. > >> This PR seems to be overwrapped with #31227. How should I treat #31227? I >> can close it if this PR can cover the problem in it. >> >> I've created PR #31227 for fixing the problem on x64. I saw the error which >> related to multilib when I built devkit on Rocky Linux and Fedora, but this >> PR does not seem to fix it (`--disable-multilib` is not specified specified >> for GCC). >> >> In #31227, @erikj79 commented he will discuss about it internally, thus I >> guess the direction of fixing should follow that conclusion. > > This PR does not aim to change 32bit support. I think that should still be a > separate change, because this change is likely going to be backported so we > can produce devkits with 32bit support for our internal update releases. @erikj79 thank you for the review and feedback. I tried to address it all in the most recent commit, have a look and let me know. Meanwhile I'll do another round of testing to make sure it all still works. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31303#issuecomment-4579781519
