> While following up on concurrent marking performance, I noticed that we > stopped / failed to inline some of the hot methods in marking loop. We need > to rework this. > > This PR replaces the build-time "bump" for inlining heuristics into explicit > inlining hints across the hot path. I have eyeballed the profiles on typical > workloads and the inlining makes sense now. > > Additional testing: > - [x] Linux x86_64 server fastdebug, `hotspot_gc_shenandoah` > - [x] Ad-hoc marking performance tests > - [ ] Regular testing pipelines > > --------- > - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK > Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).
Aleksey Shipilev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains seven additional commits since the last revision: - Keep "inline" on do_chunked_array - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8385643-shenandoah-rework-mark-inline - Cosmetics - Benchmarks show array path is still important - A few more cosmetics - Touchup - Work ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31634/files - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31634/files/a57cb2fe..edb54f50 Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=31634&range=02 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=31634&range=01-02 Stats: 2772 lines in 112 files changed: 2252 ins; 188 del; 332 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31634.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/31634/head:pull/31634 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31634
