On Tue, 11 Aug 2026 17:48:21 GMT, Erik Joelsson <[email protected]> wrote:
> No need. I was just curious. Further measurements are not a requirement for > integrating this. This is all opt in and each user will need to decide for > themselves what tradeoffs they are willing to make to get optimal performance > for their workflows. Thanks, that makes sense. I made a small fix (quoting the argument to `AC_MSG_ERROR()` by one more level, since the comma in the argument was getting interpreted as the argument separator, presumably after processing the `IF_ENABLED` callback). > we would trade one set of problems for another, as such systems tend to be > quite opinionated, and we would likely end up butting against those opinions > quite a lot, as we also tend to be rather opinionated. Yes, indeed. As an example, the globbing pattern is quite common in the existing build but it's discouraged by CMake and largely unsupported in Meson. Thanks for helping me understand the historical context. Related, has there been any discussion about enabling build caching for GHA? Based on [JDK-8027584](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8027584), it seems like ccache was enabled for every build at some point in time, and I understand the reasons for not going back to that, but do we have enough confidence now to enable it in the GHA builds? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32059#issuecomment-5259849486
