#2269: Rewrite buildstep tests against real RemoteCommands.
------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: tom.prince | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: 0.8.+
Version: 0.8.6p1 | Resolution:
Keywords: tests |
------------------------+--------------------
Changes (by dustin):
* keywords: => tests
* type: defect => enhancement
* milestone: undecided => 0.8.+
Comment:
I'm not totally convinced this is worthwhile -- right now, the tests
verify that the steps correctly interact with the !RemoteCommand
interface. If we are also testing the !RemoteCommand interface at the
same time, then the tests are no longer unit tests.
We should definitely test the !RemoteCommand implementation against a fake
slave - we do a little bit of that now, but it can be much more thorough
with a pluggable backend.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.buildbot.net/ticket/2269#comment:1>
Buildbot <http://buildbot.net/>
Buildbot: build/test automation
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
Buildbot-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/buildbot-commits
