#2297: Config-time checks for 'codebase' correctness
------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: jaredgrubb | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: 0.8.7
Version: master | Resolution:
Keywords: |
------------------------+--------------------
Changes (by dustin):
* milestone: undecided => 0.8.7
Comment:
The documentation indicates that Source steps are basically required to
have a `codebase` attribute. If that's part of the Source interface, then
it's not at all unreasonable for !BuildFactory to have a validation method
that ensures that either no Source steps have a codebase, or all do.
That requires a lot of `isinstance(Source, ..)`, though, which always
makes me a bit uncomfortable.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.buildbot.net/ticket/2297#comment:1>
Buildbot <http://buildbot.net/>
Buildbot: build/test automation
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Buildbot-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/buildbot-commits
