On May 2, 2008, at 12:56 PM, Assaf Arkin wrote:
Agree, but I want to clarify a couple of points:
Git is presently a choice, and we wont' be running off SVN, until
Apache
infrastructure switches to Git. It's an option available to anyone,
and
they can choose to use it any way they want.
We can warn people of the potential for misuse, but we can't stop
them from
using Git. Alternatively, we can warn people of the potential for
misuse,
and provide a way to use it responsibly, turning it into a benefit.
And I
articulated some of the ways in which Git could work better than SVN.
So it's about the way we make it easier on everyone to use Git
responsibly,
so that -- not misuse -- becomes the default path and the one
everybody can
follow by example.
Assuming this happens, how do you plan on addressing the issue
if and when Buildr graduates? Will you be proposing either (1)
the Buildr alone is using a process and flow that no other
ASF project is using or (2) that it completely dies when the
project goes TLP.
I'm assuming you can see the issues with either scenario...
