The reason I didn't include addon to begin with is that everything there is (or was) stuff that fell out of lib: not as well maintained, documented, tested or committed to.
I wasn't expecting it to have full or for that matter any test coverage, but rather for some parts to mature and either move to lib, or collected into separate gems (e.g. buildr-coverage). Not sure if we should keep this policy, but if we do, let's move Emma and Cobertura to lib. Assaf On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:14 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: lacton > Date: Wed Oct 1 05:14:19 2008 > New Revision: 700747 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=700747&view=rev > Log: > Keep an eye on the test coverage of addons > > Modified: > incubator/buildr/trunk/rakelib/rspec.rake > > Modified: incubator/buildr/trunk/rakelib/rspec.rake > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/buildr/trunk/rakelib/rspec.rake?rev=700747&r1=700746&r2=700747&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- incubator/buildr/trunk/rakelib/rspec.rake (original) > +++ incubator/buildr/trunk/rakelib/rspec.rake Wed Oct 1 05:14:19 2008 > @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ > task.spec_opts << '--colour' if $stdout.isatty > task.rcov = true > task.rcov_dir = 'reports/coverage' > - task.rcov_opts << '--exclude / --include-file ^lib --text-summary' > + task.rcov_opts << '--exclude / --include-file ^lib --include-file ^addon > --text-summary' > end > file 'reports/coverage'=>'coverage' > > > >
