Incidentally, should we make tasks like `shell:jirb` project-local, or just `shell`?
Daniel On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Alex Boisvert <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Daniel Spiewak <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Assaf's parametrized idea seems like the "proper" way to do this, but I > > don't like the syntax. At least to my eye, shell:jirb is *much* nicer > and > > more consistent with the "Buildr philosphy" than shell[jirb]. Besides, > the > > former is marginally easier to type. > > > I feel the same way. I'm curious to see if many Rake-based projects will > adopt this new convention. > > > > We could use your multiple-tasks idea without too much hardship in the > > implementation. I've got all the providers in a Hash, so a simple .each > { > > |lang, prov| define_task ... } should be sufficient. I'm fine with doing > > it > > this way as long as y'all are ok with it. :-) > > > One precedent I can think of is the form "buildr test:SomeTest", which I > like so I'm supportive of following our existing convention. > > alex >
