So far, at least, things are looking much better - the front page does take a while to load initially, but I don't see any hanging jobs, which had been cropping up in less time than this previously, and I don't see the polling problems either...
A. On Monday, May 26, 2014, Andrew Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: > Downgraded and restarted - let's see how things go now... > > A. > > > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Andrew Bayer > <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > > wrote: > >> I'm starting work on moving to 1.554.1 - I'd really prefer to go with >> 1.532.3, but there are just enough installed plugins that are newer than >> 1.532 that I'll play it safe. >> >> A. >> >> >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Andrew Bayer >> <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> > wrote: >> >>> That's what's happening across all the slaves with Maven jobs. >>> >>> A. >>> >>> >>> On Monday, May 26, 2014, Olivier Lamy >>> <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Note I have disabled ubuntu 5&6 nodes. As jobs were hanging on those >>>> nodes. >>>> Especially when installing artifacts locally, someone to have a look >>>> if there any io issues on those servers? >>>> >>>> On 26 May 2014 14:15, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > Go if you have a bit of time. >>>> > I just finished to downgrade to jdk1.7.0_55 (master and ubuntu >>>> slaves). >>>> > Furthermore I have increase memory for all slaves (the slave process >>>> > is now using -Xmx1024m for all ubuntu slaves) >>>> > >>>> > On 26 May 2014 11:16, Andrew Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> Downgrading to the latest LTS definitely seems like a good idea. Do >>>> you want >>>> >> to do that or should I? >>>> >> >>>> >> On May 23, 2014 9:51 PM, "Olivier Lamy" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Out of the trendy tendance to say this plugin is crap :-) >>>> >>> What is the real technical reason? >>>> >>> I don't see any in the jira issue. >>>> >>> Why we don't try using LTS? >>>> >>> The current master is plenty of changes especially in the remoting >>>> >>> library. >>>> >>> And revert back masters/slaves to java 1.7 ( I can do it Monday ). >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Cheers >>>> >>> -- >>>> >>> Olivier >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On May 24, 2014 4:10 AM, "Andrew Bayer" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> So I opened https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-23098for >>>> >>>> this, >>>> >>>> and am currently putting together the support bundle mentioned in >>>> it. But it >>>> >>>> looks like there's a very real chance that the Maven plugin/job >>>> type is just >>>> >>>> so thoroughly crap at scale that we need to get rid of it and move >>>> all jobs >>>> >>>> to freestyle projects, using Maven build steps instead. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> If that turns out to be the only real option, it's going to be an >>>> ugly >>>> >>>> transition, given that we have over 600 Maven projects from many >>>> different >>>> >>>> projects, and there's no automatic way to transition those >>>> projects. I can >>>> >>>> probably come up with something that'll do a pretty decent >>>> approximation of >>>> >>>> that, but it wouldn't be perfect. We may want to consider tossing >>>> all the >>>> >>>> Maven jobs, removing the Maven plugin, and having the projects >>>> rebuild the >>>> >>>> jobs themselves. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> A. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Olivier Lamy >>>> > Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au >>>> > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Olivier Lamy >>>> Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au >>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >>>> >>> >> >
