Hi Gav, thanks for looking into this
> Gavin McDonald <[email protected]> hat am 27. Juni 2014 um 11:12 > geschrieben: > > > > On 24/06/2014, at 11:43 AM, Andreas Lehmkühler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > we have a test issue with the PDFBox build [1]. Build #1077 [2] works fine > > and > > #1078 is unstable due to some tests are failing. We didn't change anything > > related. I had a look at the console log files. The working build was on > > ubuntu3 > > and the failing one on ubuntu1. It seems as if the issue depends on the node > > configuration. I guess under the hood it's a JDK issue. The job uses "JDK > > 1.6 > > (latest)". > > > > Does the configuration of the ubuntu nodes differ or is their configuration > > supposed to be identical? If they are different, is there any chance to see > > what > > this means on different nodes? > > Configurations can vary on different nodes. They are not always identical nor > should > they be. Having said that, choosing latest java or latest ant etc should be > the same on > all nodes. > > In your case, ubuntu1 and ubuntu3 DO have identical versions of Java for > latest1.6 > and that is 1.6.0_45 on both nodes. That's odd I'd have bet it's the JDK. > What else does the build use that we could check? Hmmm, I have no real idea. It's a simple maven based build job, tiggered by svn-changes. The issue happens within a JUnit test, so most likely the culprit is something within the environment. As there is a problem with ICC-profiles it's maybe related to some native libs which are used by the JDK. Are there any differences within the OS itself? Do you have any other idea? > Thanks > > Gav… > > > > > > > BR > > Andreas Lehmkühler > > > > > > [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/PDFBox-trunk/ > > [2] https://builds.apache.org/job/PDFBox-trunk/1077/ > > [3] https://builds.apache.org/job/PDFBox-trunk/1078/ BR Andreas Lehmkühler
