Hi Allen,

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 8:12 PM Allen Wittenauer <a...@effectivemachines.com>
wrote:

>
>
> > On Sep 23, 2020, at 10:51 AM, Gavin McDonald <gmcdon...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > The above list would then become:-
> >
> > JDK_1.8_latest
> > JDK_16_latest
> > JDK_1.7.0_79_unlimited security
>
> > Thoughts please. Unless there is some real *strong* objection with
> > technical reasons then I intend to make this change in a week or two.
>
>
> This change doesn't impact me in any way/shape/form (hooray container
> images... never mind that we're not using ASF Jenkins anymore), but if I'm
> allowed to bike shed for a moment, I'd recommend putting _where_ the JDKs
> come from.  OpenJDK vs. Oracle JDK vs. Azul vs. whatever all tend to be
> slightly different.  It might save some time later since this change will
> break the world anyway.


Yes, makes sense in most places, and we do have them currently in the
descriptions, which would remain, examples:-

IBM JDK 1.8.0_261
OpenJDK 1.8.0_242

so those would become

IBM_JDK_1.8.0_261
OpenJDK_1.8.0_242

There are more, and more that we still need to repackage for 20.04 (we
install our software packages from Bintray)

In addition this page
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/JDK+Installation+Matrix
also describes which JDK is being used.


-- 

*Gavin McDonald*
Systems Administrator
ASF Infrastructure Team

Reply via email to