Hi Allen, On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 8:12 PM Allen Wittenauer <a...@effectivemachines.com> wrote:
> > > > On Sep 23, 2020, at 10:51 AM, Gavin McDonald <gmcdon...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > The above list would then become:- > > > > JDK_1.8_latest > > JDK_16_latest > > JDK_1.7.0_79_unlimited security > > > Thoughts please. Unless there is some real *strong* objection with > > technical reasons then I intend to make this change in a week or two. > > > This change doesn't impact me in any way/shape/form (hooray container > images... never mind that we're not using ASF Jenkins anymore), but if I'm > allowed to bike shed for a moment, I'd recommend putting _where_ the JDKs > come from. OpenJDK vs. Oracle JDK vs. Azul vs. whatever all tend to be > slightly different. It might save some time later since this change will > break the world anyway. Yes, makes sense in most places, and we do have them currently in the descriptions, which would remain, examples:- IBM JDK 1.8.0_261 OpenJDK 1.8.0_242 so those would become IBM_JDK_1.8.0_261 OpenJDK_1.8.0_242 There are more, and more that we still need to repackage for 20.04 (we install our software packages from Bintray) In addition this page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/JDK+Installation+Matrix also describes which JDK is being used. -- *Gavin McDonald* Systems Administrator ASF Infrastructure Team