[Build failed] Lucene.NET-Nightly - apache/lucenenet:master - Lucene.NET - 93cd1e99
Build #4.8.0-nightly0000001680 failed
Lucene.NET-Nightly
Ran for 90 minutes
View results
Summary
Build pipeline Lucene.NET-Nightly
Finished Tue, Dec 21 2021 18:31:03 GMT+00:00
Reason Schedule
Details
Test net48,x64 on Windows
0 error(s), 0 warning(s)
Test net5.0,x64 on
0 error(s), 0 warning(s)
Test net461,x64 on
0 error(s), 0 warning(s)
Website
0 error(s), 0 warning(s)
Publish_Azure_Artifacts
0 error(s), 0 warning(s)
Docs
0 error(s), 0 warning(s)
Test net6.0,x86 on
0 error(s), 0 warning(s)
Test net48,x86 on Windows
0 error(s), 0 warning(s)
Test net6.0,x64 on
0 error(s), 0 warning(s)
Test net461,x86 on
0 error(s), 0 warning(s)
Test net5.0,x86 on
0 error(s), 0 warning(s)
Build Release Artifacts for [VOTE]
0 error(s), 0 warning(s)
Test netcoreapp3.1,x86 on
0 error(s), 0 warning(s)
Build
0 error(s), 0 warning(s)
Test netcoreapp3.1,x64 on
1 error(s), 0 warning(s)
Test run failed due to too many failed tests. Maximum failures allowed: 0, total failures: 1.
Test results
Failed 1
Passed 134187
Others 1745
Total tests 135933
Total run duration 76 minutes
Commits
93cd1e99 BREAKING: Removed (more) unnecessary nullable value types (see #574 and #581) (#583) NightOwl888
55ebd1ec Lucene.Net.Expressions.SimpleBindings: Added collection initializer and updated DistanceFacetsExample and ExpressionAggregationFacetsExample to demonstrate usage. NightOwl888
18e84c16 PERFORAMANCE: Lucene.Net.Search.FieldCacheRangeFilter: Added protected Equals(x, y) method to allow subclasses to compare equality for value types without boxing NightOwl888
8b8ec3ba BREAKING: Lucene.Net.Util.Fst: Added class constraint on all generics (#581) NightOwl888
46e24371 BREAKING: Lucene.Net.Documents.DateTools/Lucene.Net.QueryParser Updates (#580) NightOwl888
We sent you this notification on behalf of [Lucene.NET]\Lucene.NET Team. View
Microsoft respects your privacy. Review our Online Services Privacy Statement.
One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA, USA 98052.
Sent from Azure DevOps


Reply via email to