Does anyone else see the error about spotless on branch_9_0?

I checked this locally and it doesn't fail for me.

Execution failed for task ':solr:solrj:spotlessJavaCheck'.
> The following files had format violations:

solr/solrj/src/java/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/impl/XMLResponseParser.java
          @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@
           ··········break;

           ········case·XMLStreamConstants

-················.SPACE:·//·TODO?··should·this·be·trimmed?·make·sure·it·only·gets·one/two·space?

+············.SPACE:·//·TODO?··should·this·be·trimmed?·make·sure·it·only·gets·one/two·space?
           ········case·XMLStreamConstants.CDATA:
           ········case·XMLStreamConstants.CHARACTERS:
           ··········builder.append(parser.getText());
          @@ -542,7 +542,7 @@
           ··········break;

           ········case·XMLStreamConstants

-················.SPACE:·//·TODO?··should·this·be·trimmed?·make·sure·it·only·gets·one/two·space?

+············.SPACE:·//·TODO?··should·this·be·trimmed?·make·sure·it·only·gets·one/two·space?
           ········case·XMLStreamConstants.CDATA:
           ········case·XMLStreamConstants.CHARACTERS:
           ··········builder.append(parser.getText());
  Run './gradlew :solr:solrj:spotlessApply' to fix these violations.

Kevin Risden


On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 5:22 AM Apache Jenkins Server <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Build: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Check-9.0/385/
>
> All tests passed
>
> Build Log:
> [...truncated 1018 lines...]
> BUILD FAILED in 55m 23s
> 532 actionable tasks: 532 executed
> Build step 'Invoke Gradle script' changed build result to FAILURE
> Build step 'Invoke Gradle script' marked build as failure
> Archiving artifacts
> Recording test results
> [Checks API] No suitable checks publisher found.
> Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
> Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to