On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 18:01 +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 10:52 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 17:46 +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > > Apparently there have been some large > > > changes between 0.9.8-2 and 0.9.8-5 which have made the latter somewhat > > > incompatible with mergerepo. > > > > > > > ???? > > > > I'm just glancing through the git logs and I don't see anything serious > > or obviously incompatible. > > > > some more info n the above claim would be helpful. > > I may have been hasty in blaming createrepo. It may also be the > difference between yum-3.2.22 and yum-3.2.23. > > The newRepo task under createrepo-0.9.8-5 and yum-3.2.23 gave a total > package count of 19137/16961 which seemed to indicate that it was a > concatenation of release and updates rather than the latest packages. > > More seriously (but probably yum rather than createrepo), I was getting > > File "/usr/sbin/kojid", line 558, > in getPackageList > for h in ts.dbMatch(): > TypeError: rpmdb open failed > > at the end of a package build. Downgrading to yum-3.2.22 and > createrepo-0.9.8-2 fixed both bugs. >
yum 3.2.22 from upstream? or yum 3.2.22 from rhel? b/c 3.2.22 from rhel has A LOT of patches. -sv -- buildsys mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/buildsys
