On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:13:20 -0800 "Brian C. Lane" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I took a look at pungi and decided that with the state it is in, and > my lack of deep understanding of it, I don't want to tackle > converting it to DNF. So, in order to support the ability to > independently move lorax to DNF and Python3 I've converted the > library call to run lorax as a process. > > I'm still undecided about moving lorax to DNF for F22 or not. I'll > probably make a decision on that after tomorrow's Anaconda DNF test > day. I would rather not change this for Fedora 22. > I *am* going to make the switch for rawhide on Friday though, so > these changes will need to be in the rawhide version of pungi soon. Rawhide soon will be switching to the pungi 4 development branch and changing dramatically how we make things. porting that to python 3 and dnf is very high up on the list of things to do. > I've done multiple test runs and things look good, at least on > x86_64. The only issues I have right now are that the boot.iso is > about 200M larger than the F21 one, and DNF doesn't log transaction > decisions yet so it's hard to track down what's getting pulled in by > what. Seems like an extra reason not to switch f22 to using dnf for lorax Dennis -- buildsys mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/buildsys
