On Monday, June 29, 2020 11:23:21 PM CEST PGNet Dev wrote: > On 6/29/20 9:23 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Monday, June 29, 2020 6:05:39 PM CEST PGNet Dev wrote: > >> now, to wait for needed COPR fixes and push this all there ... > > > > What fixes do you have in mind? > > the issue I'd raised in an earlier thread ...
Hmm, I don't see BuildArch problems mentioned anywhere :-( but I may be missing something. Please report _copr_ issues in [1] or on copr-devel list [2]. > atm copr builds fail as follows, for specs/srpms that build/install OK locally > with both rpmbuild & mock, > ... > stderr: error: No compatible architectures found for build > can't parse specfile You may get either x86_64 or aarch64 builders at this moment for your source build (and we are waiting for ppc64le to be re-assembled so we can use them, too). ... > despite explicitly setting > > BuildArch: x86_64 ... But by this statement you _declare_ a build failure on any non-x86_64 architecture. This is something you probably never want (I checked Fedora packages, and none of ~22k packages uses this). [1] https://pagure.io/copr/copr/issues [2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/copr-de...@lists.fedorahosted.org/ Pavel _______________________________________________ buildsys mailing list -- buildsys@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to buildsys-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/buildsys@lists.fedoraproject.org
