Peter, I find the wording of the first bullet under "Quality: Level of detail" to be a little confusing. It looks like there may be a typo in there... but I'm still not clear on this part of the question. Still one doozey of a FAQ, though! I believe you might win that "I stumped Stanley" tee-shirt with FAQ-2. -Chris At 06:44 PM 7/25/01 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >The three subjects on DDE at the meeting this morning with Stanley at CMS >were: > >1. Paragraph 8.3 footnote. There is no intent in the rules to suggest that >only providers are relieved of format while plans are not. It was not >thought that an FAQ is required and that the language in the DDE paper on >this subject is adequate to cover the (non)issue. > >2. Paragraph 8.5. It was suggested that we should submit a FAQ on whether >the DDE exception should limit a plan's DDE service to only providers or be >expanded to other plans and clearinghouses. I have written an FAQ for this >point. > >3. Paragraphs 8.15 ad 8.16. We is discussed the wording of the FAQ and it >was suggested that the FAQ include examples. > >Attached is a draft of the two FAQs for consideration at the Business Issues >teleconference next Tuesday. > >Peter > >Peter Barry >Peter T Barry Company >Ozaukee Bank Building >1425 West Mequon Road >Mequon Wisconsin 53092 >(414) 732 5000 (national cell) >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >********************************************************************** >To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request. Christopher J. Feahr, OD Vision Data Standards Council Executive Director http://visiondatastandard.org Cell/Pager: 707-529-2268 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ********************************************************************** To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.
