Maria
You are correct about the attachments issue and the need to make sure that is
part of the conversation. I contacted representatives of all the groups you have
listed with the announcement (although I might have gotten bumped from the asig
list serve??). So far several have responded and shown interest. Like you, I am
hoping that we have all the DSMO groups represented.
Thanks for passing on the word!
j
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Jan / All
>
> Food for thought as we try to define the scope of this discussion...
>
> Consider whether there is an impact on the work being done in claims
> attachments, and also what impact that work (like developing the home health
> attachment) will have on the X12 837 IGs in the future. We (WG2, WG9
> specifically and HL7 just because so many of us are also X12 ers) always knew
> we had to address the issue of "migration of data" from the 837s to the 275 /
> HL7 but we never really started mapping the strategy to do that. I just
> think that we can't talk about use of the 837's without considering whether
> or not there will be / is an attachment impact.
>
> Also, we will only be doing a service to the industry if we have
> representation from the NUBC and NUCC in this discussion. These groups have
> these "kind" of discussions all the time (as they relate to both the paper
> and electronic formats) so it only makes sense to have ONE discussion,
> involving all stakeholders.
>
> I'm copying WG9, HL7 ASIG, NUCC and NUBC representatives on this response in
> the hope that each of these groups will have official representation on this
> sub - wg. Should prove to be an interesting discussion...I'm looking forward
> to it.
>
> Maria Ward
>
> Co-Chair, HL7 ASIG
> Member, NUCC
**********************************************************************
To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.
