Dear Group,
I'm beginning a conversation with a large commercial vision payor and I was
planning to make the following statement to them. I would like to know if
it is factually correct, as written. If I'm wrong or even "slightly off
base" regarding any part of it, I would appreciate your comments:
"If [VISION PAYOR] requires "non-traditional-claim" information (e.g.,
specific details about the frame, lenses, coatings, spectacle-Rx, etc.,
commonly included in the doctor's "purchase order") to process/pay a claim,
then the totality of that information plus the 837-information would
constitute "The Claim". Since a HIPAA-standard does not exist for the
information normally found on a lab purchase order, it will not be legal
after 10-16-02 for [VISION PAYOR] to receive that information
electronically. Information necessary for routine claim adjudication that
cannot be placed into a standard "837 claim" or into one of the standard
"claim attachments" (proposed by HL7 and the Claim Attachment Committee)
will have to be sent to the vision plan or its exclusive business agent,
via paper. A second alternative would be for [VISION PAYOR] to adjudicate
claims without this information."
Thanks very much for your feedback.
-Chris
Christopher J. Feahr, OD Vision Data Standards Council
Executive Director http://visiondatastandard.org
Cell/Pager: 707-529-2268 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**********************************************************************
To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.
