We use a standard software package used by many other payers for processing claims. Our vendor has chosen to only include the provider taxonomy code as a "static" field in the provider contract table, rather than accepting the code as billed by the provider on an 837. Therefore, we can only assign a taxonomy code to a claim in our database by a relational link rather than having the taxonomy code stored on the claim itself. I would like to hear what others think about the acceptability of this approach as opposed to requiring that the our database accept whatever taxonomy code a provider chooses to submit on the 837.
********************************************************************** To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.
