Major payers who are farther along in their preparations will not
necessarily want to delay.  Or, their project plan for implementation
(required for the application to delay) could call for a phase-in of the
standards - they may want to stay "on schedule" with one or several large
providers with whom they have a good relationship and with whom they want to
start working directly rather than through a clearinghouse...or, they may
want to add support for a new transaction (Claim Status?  278?) as part of
an administrative cost-cutting plan, and so may want to stay "on-schedule"
with providers or clearinghouses who are also "on-schedule"...

Individual "transaction senders" sharing with their big partner "transaction
receivers" information re: how they're addressing the delay option could
give logic to the whole thing...provide for good planning and execution...

Cynthia Korman

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Sallyards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: Transaction Delay Question


> Can anyone tell me if they think that this issue is industry wide, now
that
> organizations can apply for a delay? Will the payors accommodate the needs
> of the providers (even though it is the providers responsibility). I am
> working with some providers and we trying to determine when will be the
best
> time to flip the (transaction) switch.
>
> Scott
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Christopher J. Feahr, OD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 10:12 AM
> Subject: Re: Transaction Delay Question
>
>
> > Until the deadline (any payor's deadline), that particular payor can
> > legally refuse to conduct a TX as standard even if the provider requests
> > that it do so.  It certainly doesn't HAVE to refuse, but it can.  So the
> > provider's options are exactly the same as they are today... figure out
> how
> > to create the format that the payor WILL accept directly or go through a
> > clearinghouse.  The costs for both options would have to be borne by the
> > provider... right up until the Payor's compliance deadline.  After that,
> if
> > that payor is still not ready and still requires a CH to translate std.
to
> > proprietary, then the PAYOR will have to pay for the provider's
> translation
> > service.
> >
> > (keeping track of this looks like a major pain for the CH)
> > -Chris
> >
> > At 08:22 PM 1/9/02 -0500, Paul Costello wrote:
> >
> >
> > >What are the business implications of the following scenario that
occurs
> > >on October 17, 2002:
> > >
> > >I am a health plan and I already filed for the extension (I only have
the
> > >capability to accept non-standard formats).
> > >
> > >One of my trading partners (Provider ABC) purchased a whole new health
> > >information system that is 100% HIPAA compliant and only has the
ability
> > >to conduct electronic transactions in the HIPAA standard format.
> > >
> > >Since I (as the health plan that filed for the extension) can not
accept
> > >standard transactions yet, and my trading partner (who just purchased a
> > >HIPAA-compliant HIS) can only send standard transactions, what happens?
> > >
> > >Am I, as the health plan who can not accept standard transactions,
> > >responsible for routing those transactions through a clearinghouse, or
is
> > >it the responsibility of the provider?  What other solutions exist?
> > >
> > >It seems like this situation, and many variations like it, will become
> > >problematic after October 16, 2002.
> > >
> > >Any thoughts are appreciated.
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >Paul
> > >
> > >**********************************************************************
> > >To be removed from this list, go to:
> > >http://snip.wedi.org/unsubscribe.cfm?listsiness
> > >and enter your email address.
> >
> > Christopher J. Feahr, OD
> > http://visiondatastandard.org
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cell/Pager: 707-529-2268
> >
> >
> > **********************************************************************
> > To be removed from this list, go to:
> http://snip.wedi.org/unsubscribe.cfm?list=business
> > and enter your email address.
> >
> >
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> To be removed from this list, go to:
http://snip.wedi.org/unsubscribe.cfm?list=business
> and enter your email address.
>


**********************************************************************
To be removed from this list, go to: http://snip.wedi.org/unsubscribe.cfm?list=business
and enter your email address.

Reply via email to