[taking this on-list again] On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:52:15PM +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote: >Hi Bernhard, > >On Wednesday 28 March 2007 22:42, Bernhard Fischer wrote: >> >> just for the sake of patching, thus mimiking the good fortune I >> >> could use when dealing with run_parts.c? There is a severe risk >> >> of crowding the configuration file with many such "feature long" >> >> symbols if I would become successful in my venture. For the moment >> >> I would say it is safer to stick with CONFIG_GETOPT_LONG and run >> >> the risk of later patching to mend in details. >> > >> >Yes, please. >> >> Please no! >> >> There are only a couple of applets that support long options in the >> first place. Please let's have fine-grained control over those few. >> Pretty please. > >I am not planning to remove such fine-grained options, I am merely >saying that I do not _require_ people to introduce them. > >BTW I saw you as usual beat me to run_parts.c getopt32 conversion >and it is smaller than mine.... ohhh :( > >Thanks!
welcome. There is one issue i just stumbled across that was not present before the move to kbuild: docs/BusyBox.html isn't updated anymore, it seems (it was automagically updated, iirc). While at it (there should pop-up an example for run-parts in the .html), it _looks_ like Rob dropping APPLET_ODD_NAME foobared the applet-names for "odd" applets that contain a dash: see e.g. run-parts (as it should read correctly) in http://busybox.net/downloads/BusyBox.html Also, busybox.net/screenshot.html is horribly out of date. vda, please remember to update it if you release a new version :) cheers, _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
