On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 05:11:37PM +0200, Jean Wolter wrote: >Jean Wolter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> busybox ip and the original ip utility behave differently when setting >> the following route (verified with ip route show using the original ip >> utility): >> >> ip route add 10.0.0.138 dev eth0 > >In the meantime someone changed libiproute/iproute.c in the busybox >repository without considering the patch attached to my previous >mail. Should I provide a patch against the repository or is this a non >issue?
Merged, thanks. I'm now de-bloating iproute a little bit.. Would be awesome if you could test it afterwards, TIA _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list [email protected] http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
